After the historic decay of the corrupt and bankrupt Democratic and Republican Parties, with their conventions to destroy civil society and promote plutocracy, and the sad wimpy complaining of the Green Party and Libertarian Party, not to mention horrific betrayals by those those of RFK, we need a convention that is about truth, about the real needs of the nation, and about concrete workable proposals. Green LIberty PAC, as the only political action committee dedicated to addressing state crimes, is the also the only political force left in the moral desert.
Please be sure to attend our convention, and to get the news out to your substack, or any other list, tomake sure as many people as possible attend. The convention is not accidently on the day before the first anniversary of October 7, BTW. It is literally now or never.
The truth goes marching on!
Thanks
Emanuel
REGISTER HERE:
Green Liberty PAC Convention 2024 | Green Liberty PAC
Green Liberty PAC National Convention
Sunday October 6, 2024
5-7 PM West Coast
8-10 PM East Coast;
REGISTER HERE:
Green Liberty PAC Convention 2024 | Green Liberty PAC
SAVE THE DATE!
The Green Liberty PAC will bring together truth leaders from across the country for our first national convention on Sunday October 6, 2024 at which we will confront the political, economic, social, and cultural malaise that has wrapped its claws around the nation and formulate together an honest and practical strategy for restoring accountability, transparency, and ethics in governance.
In contrast to the corporate-funded Republican National Convention in July, and Democratic National Convention in August, the Green Liberty PAC Convention will make it clear that our legitimacy derives not from how many billions of dollars in ill-got wealth we pull in, nor from how much mainstream media coverage our carnival attracts. No! We will affirm the basic rights of all citizens, propose a roadmap for creating an egalitarian society, demand the truth about state crimes, and insist on due process regarding all crimes so that no citizen will be above the law.
This convention will be the start of a fundamental transformation of American political culture and the realization of the full potential hidden within our constitutional republic. We will create a nation that guarantees equal rights to citizens and that assures meaningful participatory democracy. In other words, we will make America great for the first time.
Our convention is about our citizens, including—no! especially those who are homeless, victims of the weaponized Supreme Court rulings. All poor and homeless are welcome to attend the Green Liberty PAC Convention!
We welcome those who have been crippled by poisonous vaccines and the other fake medicines peddled by corporations; we welcome those who are not allowed to reach their human potential because they are deprived of education, or driven into debt.
Corporate representatives, lobbyists, and financial PR consultants, however, are not welcome to this convention.
Speakers:
Chair for Green Liberty Convention
Chuck Fall
Chuck Fall
Chairman, Green Liberty Caucus/Bloc
“The vision of a Green Liberty Bloc and a liberation coalition”
Emanuel Pastreich
Former Green Party candidate for president
“Fear No Evil: A presidential campaign that addresses state crimes and the long-term development of the United States”
Jeremy Kuzmarov
Managing Editor, CovertAction Magazine
“The Bankruptcy of the Two-Party System in the US today and need for a new Truth Politics/Party.”
Gloria Guillo
Green Renaissance-Sovereign Rights Movement
“Sovereign Rights and World War”
John Spritzler
Editor, People for a Democratic Revolution, Boston
“What would be an egalitarian approach to politics”
Tony Hall
Author of “Earth into Property: Colonialization, Decolonialization and Capitalism”
“Contention and Compromise under the Big Tent of Green Liberty”
Section two:
Open discussion on the following topics:
1) Being Green by standing on reverence and respect for nature and biological diversity and recognizing our place in an organic whole of the Earth
2) Liberty: the fierce defense of the rights of citizens to control their own economic, intellectual, cultural and bodily autonomy and sovereignty
3) How to draft a proposal for a liberation coalition that will directly address how our society has become a technocracy that is preparing a deadly techno-totalitarianism, and include concrete proposals for solutions that morally committed citizens could advance.
4) How to identify and refute the ruling class’s divide-and-rule strategies
5) How to draft a proposal for advancing a bloc of Green Liberty candidates for the 2026 Congressional elections. How to draft a proposal to advance concrete efforts to cultivate, train and support a new generation of truth leaders in American politics.
6) Establish an advisory committee to guide the work of Green Liberty PAC and define assignment of duties.
7) How to draft a Green Liberty Declaration of Liberation to advance Liberty Bloc candidates.
Please Register today!
Sunday October 6, 2024
5-7 PM West Coast
8-10 PM East Coast;
Location
Meeting is virtual on Zoom Meet on Zoom,
Register in advance for the National Convention:
REGISTER HERE:
Green Liberty PAC Convention 2024 | Green Liberty PAC
The following interview appeared today in Japan’s Asahi Shimbun Newspaper English language section. This article is the first example of a mainstream media source mentioning my campaign for president ever, anywhere. I wish to express my great thanks to the brave people in Japan who have fought to help us get on the stage and challenge not only the establishment, but also the fake “anti-globalists” who feed at the billionaires trough in secret.
U.S. scholar vowed to scrap nuclear arms in presidential bid
U.S. scholar Emanuel Pastreich took at face value the textbooks claiming that the United States had no choice but to drop atomic bombs on Japan to end World War II and save lives that he read in high school.
After years of research, and visits to Nagasaki and Hiroshima, the expert on East Asian diplomacy is now convinced that the United States owes an apology to Japan for the bombings and must also eliminate its stockpile of nuclear weapons.
Pastreich, president of the think tank Asia Institute, highlighted these issues during his short-lived bid to run as a candidate from the Green Party in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
“Some people may think my apology was too extreme and others may think it was a brave act,” Pastreich, 59, said in a recent interview with The Asahi Shimbun. “I do not think it was either. I was merely doing my duty as a U.S. presidential candidate.”
I expressed my formal apology in a speech I delivered on Aug. 6, the 78th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima.
“As an American, I offer my deep apologies to the Japanese people for this bombing,” I said in the speech, which was later broadcast on YouTube.
I also stated unambiguously, “The atomic bombings were not necessary.”
In my declaration of candidacy for the 2024 U.S. presidential nomination from the Green Party, I made a public promise that “America will get rid of all its nuclear weapons within 10 years.”
Unfortunately, I was unable to gain the necessary support to continue the campaign for the nomination from the Green Party and withdrew at the end of September.
The mainstream American media has not covered my comments or speeches from that period.
Even so, as an American who aspires to become U.S. president, I wanted to apologize for the atomic bombings and to make a public promise that the United States will stop the development and deployment of nuclear weapons.
I was born in the United States and educated in the United States.
The history books I read in high school taught me that “in order to end the war quickly and save lives, we had no choice but to drop the atomic bomb.”
My teachers said the same thing, and so I did not think deeply about the matter at the time.
When I studied in Taiwan (in 1985) for my junior year of college, I encountered the Japanese culture that had been left behind from the colonial period and I was inspired to study about Japan seriously.
After I graduated from Yale, I came to Japan, studied the Japanese language, and then entered the graduate program at the University of Tokyo.
My major was Japanese literature, but I read broadly in modern Japanese history as well.
Those readings gave me insights into what the United States had done in Asia.
I started to have doubts about what Americans did from World War II, to the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, and I asked myself why we continued to expand militarily.
I first visited Nagasaki in 1991. The visit was related to my graduate research on how Chinese culture was imported into Japan through the port of Nagasaki in the 19th century.
I visited the site of the foreign settlement Dejima and Chinatown.
I also stopped by the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum.
That was my first exposure to images of the apocalyptic ruins of Nagasaki and the burned bodies of innocent civilians.
That experience made me realize that the United States is a country capable of doing terrible things like this.
It was clear that dropping the atomic bombs had been a mistake and that it was wrong for the United States to keep nuclear weapons today.
When I had occasion later to visit Hiroshima, those thoughts became only the stronger.
In 2016, Barack Obama became the first sitting U.S. president to visit Hiroshima. U.S. President Joe Biden also visited the city when he attended the Group of Seven summit there in May.
But neither of them apologized for the dropping of the atomic bombs in spite of overwhelming evidence of the criminality of the act.
Many people in the United States perhaps think it is natural that their government takes such a position about the dropping of the atomic bombs, but I do not.
Some people may think my apology was too extreme and others may think it was a brave act.
I do not think it was either. I was merely doing my duty as a U.S. presidential candidate.
It was an apology that meant that we Americans must understand Japan and must not forget the sufferings of the victims of those bombings.
It was an apology meant to keep Americans from accepting as normal that the United States, a signatory to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, has refused to adhere to its obligations.
I have not had the chance to meet with the victims of the atomic bombings or their families. I am sorry I did not make the effort earlier in my career.
I hope that one day I can make an apology in person for the atomic bombings.
I will continue to make public calls for the elimination of nuclear weapons in my capacity as an expert on international relations in East Asia.
(This article is based on an interview by Asako Hanafusa.)
Born in Nashville, Tennessee, Emanuel Pastreich was educated in Chinese literature at Yale University.
He received a master’s degree at the University of Tokyo in comparative culture in 1992 and a Ph.D. in East Asian languages and civilizations from Harvard University in 1997.
He taught Japanese studies at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and George Washington University. He is currently affiliated with Yale University’s Council on East Asian Studies.
Pastreich founded the Asia Institute in 2007 as a platform for global dialogue on contemporary issues.
He declared himself a U.S. presidential candidate as an independent in February 2020.
In August, he was recognized as a registered presidential candidate in the Green Party of the United States, but he had to withdraw after failing to raise sufficient funds.
Pastreich, currently residing in Japan, commutes between Tokyo, Washington and Seoul.
“THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX MUST STAND DOWN!” November 26, 2023
Sunday, November 26, 2023
7 pm Eastern / 4pm Pacific
RESOLVED BY GREEN LIBERTY PEACE FORUM:
“THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX MUST STAND DOWN!”
Join us online as we make the case for the US hegemon, and its brutal conjoined twin Israel, to stop instigating wars and creating social and economic chaos as a means of advancing geopolitical control.
The Green Liberty Peace Forum will consider the true value of peace, and describe how the plutocracy uses war to divide and conquer the people employing the United States, Israel, and other states in this event and welcome your questions and comments.
We must understand how elites block us from finding our common interests with our neighbors that would allow us to construct an egalitarian society by manipulating war, conflicts, and violence to divide us.
American history makes it clear that numerous wars have been advanced using false flag operations designed to protect the interests of the rich and powerful. We can only liberate ourselves from the resulting “forever wars” by building a mass movement that opposes war uniformly because war is the tool for distracting us that is employed by elites to suppress all liberation movements.
— One tap mobile +14086380968,,4111946628#,,,,*943606# US (San Jose) +16694449171,,4111946628#,,,,*943606# US
Dial by your location • +1 408 638 0968 US (San Jose) • +1 669 444 9171 US • +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) • +1 253 205 0468 US • +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) • +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) • +1 719 359 4580 US • +1 309 205 3325 US • +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) • +1 360 209 5623 US • +1 386 347 5053 US • +1 507 473 4847 US • +1 564 217 2000 US • +1 646 876 9923 US (New York) • +1 646 931 3860 US • +1 689 278 1000 US • +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) • +1 305 224 1968 US
Meeting ID: 411 194 6628 Passcode: 943606
The Green Liberty Bloc is a project launched by the Green Liberty Caucus and like-minded individuals and groups across the country. For Green Liberty, liberation means establishing an egalitarian society that makes ecology central to the human project and rejects war-driven, consumption-driven economic policies. We see support for the web of life and bio-diversity as a good in itself. Human society cannot exist without a harmonious relationship with nature that sustains life.
I wish to extend my Thanksgiving greetings to all Americans and to affirm that we will return to true thanks giving on this day in the years ahead, embracing the sustainable and thankful, tolerant and deep minds of the native peoples who inspired this tradition in the first place, and overcoming the malicious, extractive, exploitative, narcissistic demons that have possessed Thanksgiving and rendered it a time for distraction and consumption, not the affirmation of our place in the natural world as one of the humble inhabitants of an ancient planet.
I know just how hard a Thanksgiving this has been for so many of you. I know that the Covid operation has destroyed local economies, that many of you are homeless, or in effect homeless, buried under debt to pay for medical bills, or for the most basic of services.
We know that every form of benefits to help the ill, the poor, and the unemployed have been stripped to the bone.
We know that while American food is shipped overseas to produce hundreds of billions in profits for multinational agribusiness, those at home go hungry because hunger has been rendered invisible in our “market economy.”
The Food Research and Action Council released a report indicating that although endless profits for banks, endless military aid to Ukraine, Israel and other nations, is the highest priority for the establishment, Americans who work for a living essentially do not exist. No, the politicians are not discussing how the political games surrounding a fabricated “government shutdown” has left out funding for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).
Some 6.7 million women and young children, about half of the children born recently in the United States, are dependent on WIC for support and services. Its evisceration under the knife held by both Democrats and Republicans has produced one of the most grim Thanksgivings ever—unless we assume, like the Democrats do, that if you don’t qualify as “middle class” any more, you simply do not exist. Single mothers working at convenience stores with no benefits who try to give a Thanksgiving for their children simply don’t count.
The reign of terror known as COVID continues. The destruction of the economy by operation COVID created dependence on food stamps and other faltering public assistance programs. The Democrats have teamed up with the Republicans to destroy these programs, and the printing up of Federal Reserve money for parasite investment banks is driving inflation for every necessity in life, a trend that has poverty knocking on the doors of many Americans who thought they were safe.
But, as they say in luxury department stores, if the stock market keeps going up, thanks to corrupt stock buybacks, who cares what happens to working Americans?
And then there is the decimation of food production and food distribution systems over the last two years, the result of a policy of “starve the poor” that is just getting started. Many neighborhoods far from upper middle-class disticts no longer have supermarkets, or if they do, most nutritious vegetables have disappeared leaving behind “food deserts” in the midst of the obscene wealth of billionaires. That wealth was not produced by innovation but stolen from working people.
Some of you remember a Thanksgivings from childhood that you cannot enjoy today. And many younger Americans have no such memories at all, but they are still jolted, shamed, and humiliated to see lavish feasts devoured by the elites that are shown on television and that make it seem as if everyone in the United States enjoys such luxuries—implying that somehow those of us who do not are somehow deficient.
Ignore such false images and false words. They do not represent the United States as it is.
The value of human experience is found in your bonds to family and friends, coworkers and neighbors, to nature and the divine. True human values have nothing do to with how much money you have, or how much you consume. Nevertheless, your freedom from hunger and want is critical to me, the highest priority for our campaign, and for our nation.
I want to wish a happy Thanksgiving to President Biden as well.
President Joe Biden is spending his Thanksgiving holiday at the lavish estate of billionaire David Rubenstein in Nantucket, Massachusetts, a popular destination for the wealthiest Americans whom the corporate media tells us we should envy and emulate, rather than condemn for their criminality.
David Rubenstein, did not become a billionaire, and close friend of President Biden, by accident.
No, David Rubenstein founded the Carlyle Group, the hedge fund private equity firm that made a fortune over the last thirty years by snatching up smaller companies, firing all their employees, liquidating all their assets and property, and then selling off the carcasses for a hefty profit. The Carlyle Group is one of the most aggressive parasitic institutions in the United States, one deeply involved in promoting the foreign wars that have crippled some of your sons and daughters now home for Thanksgiving.
The Carlyle Group that produced the wealth that built this mansion where President Biden feasts was the employer of former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci, former CIA director and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, and was home to both former presidents of war George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.
If there were Turkeys on plates awaiting the Bidens at the Rubenstein estate, there were C-17 Globemasters hovering overhead to deliver equipment to the airport for that event. For security bureaucrats, and the security firms to whom big budgets were granted, this Thanksgiving dinner was a bonanza.
We do not know what comments President Biden made on the occasion of this banquet, but we can be certain there were similar to what he said at a
Manhattan fundraiser for Wall Street backers in 2019. He assured the rich back then that his campaign rhetoric about the rich “pay their fair share” should not worry them because “Nobody has to be punished. No one’s standard of living will change, nothing would fundamentally change.”
Yes, the Biden Thanksgiving was most certainly a Thanksgiving to remember. Whereas we may be thankful that we have food to eat, that we have survived, so far, the campaign of the superrich to exterminate working people, President Bidem was giving thanks where thanks was due. Not to nature, which his administration has destroyed; not to God, whom he has betrayed in every sense; not to those who worked so hard to make his meals and to polish his silverware. No, his Thanksgiving consisted of giving thanks to the founder the Carlyle Group, a criminal enterprise that created billions of dollars in wealth by printing up its own money through the Federal Reserve, by pushing the COVID 19 reign of terror, by impoverishing working people through artificial means, and by promoting dozens of pointless, overpriced military adventures that have killed and wounded millions.
Let this be a Thanksgiving where we pray for deliverance from the parasite class; I say to President Biden what Moses said to Pharaoh Ramses II: “Let my people go!”
President Biden rushed to Israel to give his blessings, and the blessings of the United States, and of anyone else so foolish to join the parade, to whatever Israel and the United States may do after the more than a little ambiguous attacks of Hamas. President Biden declared, unambiguously stated, that Hamas had “unleashed pure unadulterated evil on the world.” He was repeating a script that someone on his staff had handed him, and he did so without any feelings or insights, just playing the role assigned to him by the rich and powerful as a pathetically broken man in a hopelessly broken system.
One must ask whether President Biden would know what evil is if it was wrapped around his neck, if it was hugging him like a brother, or if it looked him in the eyes from the other side of the mirror.
The cynicism with which Biden’s handlers throw around that word “evil” should not blind us to the blight wrought by something horrible that we see all around us; whether it is mothers caring for their sons gone blind from vaccines in Atlanta, or fathers carrying their crumpled daughter’s bodies wrapped in cardboard in Gaza.
President Biden’s speech was a fraud, but “evil” is no fraud.
Although my focus must fall, perforce, on policy, and I should leave debates on evil to learned professors of philosophy or men and women of the faith, nevertheless I feel compelled to speak out today about evil because our failure to understand the nature of evil will be our undoing. If we fail to grasp evil in its true nature, we may well roll blindly into a world war over the next month that will leave hundreds of millions dead. There is not much time and there is no time for self-deception, for self-indulgence.
Evil is real and it is not limited to the teachings of religious scriptures.
Evil is rarely an ugly monster that terrifies children with sharp claws and jagged fangs like Godzilla tearing through Tokyo.
No, evil is often seductive, attractive, and even enticing, leading us to accept it as a friend, an ally, because it flatters us and makes us feel more important than others, because it whispers in our ears that it is okay to do terrible things as long as no one else knows what we have done.
Evil is invisible; it morphs into one form, and then into another, taking on the attributes that we most desire and then vanishing suddenly, mysteriously, leaving us wondering why we have so much blood on our hands.
Although Hollywood movies suggest that evil is perpetrated by some brilliant genius behind the curtains, more often than not the origins of evil are banal and ordinary, something mentioned in passing at a backyard barbeque. Original acts of evil do not draw attention to themselves at all and therefore are easily passed over without comment.
That is the threat of a banal and undetectable evil that Hannah Arendt described thus:
“Evil is never ‘radical;’ it is only extreme. It possesses neither depth nor any demonic dimension. It can overgrow and lay waste the whole world precisely because it spreads like a fungus on the surface. Evil defies thought because when thought tries to go to the roots of evil, it is frustrated, finding nothing there. That is the ‘banality’ of evil.”
I am struggling to uncover the nature of evil because it threatens us Americans from within.
I am forced to recognize that I do not have to go to Gaza to find evil. No, I do not even need to go beyond the beltway—in fact, I do not even need to leave my comfortable living room and wide-angle TV.
As I watched President Biden there speaking in Israel, I felt as if he was animated by some power beyond himself, and beyond his staff, beyond even his political party. Something was sloughing to Jerusalem to be born in the backrooms of private intelligence firms and weapons contractors hidden behind the Stars and Stripes and the Star of David that adorned the stage.
When President Biden stated,
“I come to Israel with a single message: You are not alone. … As long as the United States stands … we’re going to stand by your side.”
He was suggesting that some horrific war has already been decided by those hidden powers and now it is time for Arabs, and Jews as well, and Americans, to die in large numbers. If it means the end of Israel and the United States, he hints, so be it. “As long at the United States stands” means “until the United States is destroyed.”
When President Biden stated that,
“If Israel didn’t exist, we would have to invent it.”
The investment banks who have made a fortune by using Israel and its security forces, and security IT, to intimidate others and to increase their profits, they most certainly knew what he meant. For, without doubt, the banks will have to invent a new Israel to do their bidding if this one is destroyed by this apocalypse they have planned out.
But perhaps the most disturbing part of the speech came after Biden said that this was not just “Israel’s 9.11,” it was “fifteen 9.11s.” Most people already know, even if they cannot come out and admit it, that 9.11 was the global military-intelligence-finance complex declaring war on the citizens of the Earth. To think that this is now going to be 15 times the millions killed in blind wars for profit is truly frightening.
Yes, one can almost sense that evil is lurking somewhere there in the corners of Biden’s forced smile.
And then President Biden described the Israeli response to this “9.11 of their own,” saying,
“I am sure those horrors have tapped into some kind of primal feeling, shock, pain, rage, an all-consuming rage—justice must be done.”
That is to say that an “all-consuming rage” that banishes reason, and stops dead the search for truth, must be the only response possible to this still ambiguous event. That “all-consuming rage” that the commercial media keeps harping on is precisely the door through which the darkest evil can pass unnoticed.
It could be a catastrophic war with Iran is coming, as Biden implied when he mentioned the movement of military assets such as the USS Ford carrier strike group to the Eastern Mediterranean, to be joined by the aircraft carrier USS Eisenhower.
Most certainly these massive clusters of weapons are not meant to attack the impoverished people huddled in Gaza. They are meant to start bombing Iran at any moment.
The more I thought about this terrible turn of events, the more I was drawn back to the elegant speech that Reverand Martin Luther King delivered on April 4, 1968, exactly one year before he was assassinated, one of the most powerful speeches delivered in American history.
When Dr. King delivered the speech “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence” at
Riverside Church in New York City, he revealed to all the true form of a thoughtful and committed man of God who had wrestled with evil, tried to make a deal with lesser evils, and then was forced to come to the painful conclusion that it was his moral duty to break his studied silence about that project of death because it had infected every corner of American society.
Dr. King used the expression “Beyond Vietnam” because he knew that the illness was a spiritual one and it went far beyond the specifics of Vietnam. He did not want to get lost in the details. He spoke to the point,
“The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit, and if we ignore this sobering reality we will find ourselves organizing “clergy- and laymen-concerned committees” for the next generation.”
“The words of the late John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years ago he said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”
“Increasingly, by choice or by accident, this is the role our nation has taken — the role of those who make peaceful revolution impossible by refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense profits of overseas investment.
I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values.
We must rapidly begin the shift from a ‘thing-oriented’ society to a ‘person-oriented’ society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.”
“A true revolution of values will look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: ‘This is not just.’”
I had the arrogance and the self-conceit, the confidence and the craftiness to imagine myself as a president. And yet, heeding Dr. King’s words, I must say as that as I witnessed President Biden invoking a new world war like a vengeful god, I felt that must also say, and say loudly and clearly, that this, my brothers and sisters, this is not just. We are opening the doors for untold evil to spill out over the world, and the cynical backroom boys are betting that we will convince ourselves that because we were not directly involved in this first step of the war, therefore somehow we think that we are not responsible.
Although I was never able to take donations and thus not actually able to launch a full campaign, I was considered for a week as a “major candidate” in the Green Party US. Here is a copy of the Wikipedia entry from that moment.
I made the following statement in release to the Green Party US:
PRESS RELEASE
EMANUEL PASTREICH WITHDRAWS FROM CAMPAIGN FOR THE GREEN PARTY US NOMINATION
SEPTEMBER 28, 2023
After taking the initial steps required to formally seek the nomination for the presidency within the Green Party US, Emanuel Pastreich has decided to withdraw from the campaign effective immediately. He remains open, however, to future collaboration with the Green Party US, if there is interest.
Pastreich, and his acting manager Chuck Fall, determined, after repeated efforts, that there were insufficient opportunities to raise the necessary funding to run even a minimal campaign within the Green Party.
Pastreich plans rather to devote his efforts, working with the Green Party and other likeminded organizations, to building a nation-wide movement dedicated to uncovering the truth, and demanding immediate change, in response to how the US government has acted against the public interest, advancing policies that enriched corporations at the expense of civil liberties, injuring and killing citizens, destroying nature, and devastating the economy of the common man and women for the benefit of the rich and powerful.
Pastreich’s quest for the Green Party US nomination was always intended to be the vanguard of a movement to end the domination of our nation by bankers and private intelligence firms, to take radical action to stop the destruction of our environment and our climate, to question the need for narcissistic consumption, mindless industrialization, and dangerous overproduction.
He will continue to work with the new movement, tentatively called the “Fear No Evil” movement, to make public to the world the state crimes undertaken by the government, in collaboration with corporate interests (domestic and international), such as the 9.11 incident, the Federal Covid Response, the promotion of untested vaccines, and other suspicious incidents at home and abroad designed to create an atmosphere of fear and loathing.
Concerning the launch of this “Fear No Evil” movement, Pastreich declared,
“The American republic and the constitutional rights of its citizens have been trampled on by the boot of private finance and beaten with the stick of corrupt politics. The resulting spiritual gangrene has spread through all institutions, reaching to the very marrow of our civilization.
The slaughter of deliberative democracy and the evisceration of scientific journalism are the handywork of a new plutocracy, self-crowned as our masters, who are busy doling out treasure to the intellectuals, scientists, and journalists who do their bidding.
I call on the Green Party to revive the tradition of progressive politics in the United States, to realize the full potential of our Constitution, and to pass on the torch of liberty and equality previously held up by John Adams, Frederick Douglass, and Susan B. Anthony, Eugene Debs, Henry Wallace, John F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King.
I imagine, no I demand, a Green Party that will call out the big lies, fight for justice and transparency without exception, and give real opportunities to those who have been so long oppressed.
We need a Green Party that will take up the banner of truth and justice dropped in the mud during the horrific political killings of the 1960s. In other words, we need a Green Party that will win by standing for our moral principles, not by bending down to collect dark money.”
The “Fear No Evil” Movement will unite all Americans to
STOP THE DRIVE FOR WORLD WAR
END THE OPPRESSION OF WORKING PEOPLE BY AN ELITE CLASS BEYOND THE LAW
CRUSH THE COVID 19 OPERATION
SEIZE THE ASSETS OF THE BILLIONAIRES BEHIND THESE SCHEMES SO AS TO COMPENSATE THOSE INJURED OR KILLED IN THIS REIGN OF TERROR
For details about what such a movement might look like, see Pastreich’s book, “How to Take Down the Billionaires” (download here).
The collection of Pastreich’s speeches “I Shall Fear No Evil” (download here) is an underground bestseller among those fighting for the rule of law.
Here are some critical planks of Pastreich’s platform that will form the core of the “Fear No Evil” movement
○ END THE COVID-19 OPERATION
○ LAUNCH INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE 9.11 INCIDENT
○ CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE COLLAPSE OF BIODIVERSITYARE THE TOP SECURITY CONCERNS
○ END SECRET GOVERNANCE
○ STOP THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO MANIPULATE CITIZENS
○ CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PEOPLE
○ THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES ARE NOT EMPOWERED BY THE CONSTITUTION TO MAKE POLICY
○ THE CREATION OF MONEY MUST BE UNDERTAKEN BY CONGRESS IN A TRANSPARENT MANNER
“Fear No Evil” will be a national movement that seeks scientific truth and demands the spiritual bravery required to transform our country, and to move beyond the corrupt corporate parties, and to do so without falling into the insidious traps of identify politics, racial ideology, or Starbucks “think left; live right” hypocrisy.
We don’t need or want corporate donations or TV commercials in the corrupt media. We want committed citizens, especially young people, to join our team, to spread the word in every neighborhood, and to tell us how to run the movement, and how to launch a movement that will not merely tweak a broken system, but will transform literally everything, starting today.
Please join us, and help us to reimagine our country’s potential, making America great for the first time.
I’m Chuck Fall, a media activist who believes in speaking truth to power, and I believe that the demand for truth should be at the center of all political action in the United States.
Today I am reaching out to Emanuel Pastreich, a fellow concerned citizen, to speak about truth politics.
I am active in the Green Party and familiar with the debates on policy that make up much of our politics. I have found myself to be, increasingly, a dissident voice.
When I deal with bread-and-butter issues, because of the influence of the deep State, because the corporate-government plutocracy has extended so deep into society, I feel we must address directly the criminality that is behind what we see on TV, we must pull back the curtain if we want to have meaningful politics in the United States.
Please allow me to introduce the project that I am advancing today. We have launched within the Green party a “Green Liberty Caucus” dedicated to making truth politics mainstream in America.
I want to highlight our website greenlibertycaucus.org, where you will find interesting posts from truth leaders. Among them, those of Cynthia McKinney have been inspirational for me, especially the appeal that she made to the “Lawyers Committee of 9/11 Truth” for the leadership necessary to engage in truth politics.
That is the motivation behind Emanuel Pastreich’s run for the presidency.
Let’s go straight to Emanuel. Give us an introduction; Why are you engaging in truth politics?
Emanuel Pastreich:
I thank you very much for the opportunity to join you and I am glad to have a chance to address everybody about the truth.
When I announced my candidacy, and started to campaign in United States in February, 2020, it was so clear then, and it’s even more bitterly clear now, that it was no longer possible to talk about the truth in American politics. Essentially all political discussion has been frozen.
We’re no longer able to address serious issues. Instead, we are caught up in trivialities. We need to change direction in the United States, to get back to a politics that addresses real issues. And real issues are not just about, what Robert Kennedy talks about in his campaign, “the destruction of the middle class.” That has become a standard line in politics, but it doesn’t go anywhere near far enough.
The reality is that we face a systemic effort by a tiny handful of the extremely rich to destroy the United States, and the global economy, and to reduce us to a form of serfdom or slavery. We have faced a series of trials, starting with the Kennedy assassination in 1963, picking up speed with the 9/11 incident in 2001, and this trend reached its crescendo with COVID-19. During COVID19, the important issues our nation faced could no longer be addressed by politicians, or by the media in the United States. So, we have been essentially flying blind since 2020.
Rather than do what most political figures would do, which is to focus on what we are allowed to talk about, I decided that it was critical to address the issues that no one’s allowed to talk about. Like where does money come from? How is it created? What actually happened with 9/11 and COVID-19?
I wanted to ask citizens, how have we gotten into this out-of-control secret governance, defined by borders within the United States? How did this small group of the super-rich, using their various mouthpieces and puppets, manage to create this politics of grand guignol, of puppetry?
This “politics” makes it impossible to address any issue seriously. So that’s what my campaign is about.
Obviously, I’m not a professional politician to start with, and obtaining power is not my dream. I will run this campaign as best I can, with help from people like you, Chuck.
If somebody else is better at kissing babies. giving rally speeches, and he or she will step in and take my place. Then I will have no attachment to the power of the presidency.
However, I will say this: I haven’t seen anyone like that yet. I haven’t seen anybody who’s willing to take this degree of risk, who’s willing to actually run for president and to argue that we must face, head on, what’s going on in the United States, and not indulge in a limited hangout discussion about secondary issues.
Chuck Fall:
You got my attention with your frankness, and your candor, about the nature of what’s happened to our society. From the Green Liberty Perspective this approach is important because we argue that history has been stolen from us.
We remember the historical possibilities represented by figures like John F. Kennedy, his brother Robert, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Freddy Hampton, and others. We remember the warning from Dwight Eisenhower about the power of the military industrial complex, and
how, when Kennedy heeded that warning it cost him his life.
The sixties, in my opinion, was a blood bath. We witnessed a brutal counter-revolution.
Yet those possibilities remain with us. Imagine if all of those figures had survived. Imagine what could have been-how American society might have unfolded very differently. It might have been a much kinder nation. I want to explore that potential here, because you are entering into the competition of politics for truth.
We see this new politics today with Robert Kennedy Jr., another candidate for president. We have his materials up on the Green Liberty caucus website.
Kennedy’s statements are extraordinary in that he says flat out that the CIA was responsible for 9/11, and that they are behind Covid19.
Robert Kennedy is trying to break out and to take truth politics to the national level. And that is why there is no media attention for him. How will you address these issues from the outside, and what will you say?
Where do you see national conversation going?
We are all struggling for air time, struggling to get our words out there. So, if Robert Kennedy’s campaign is an insurgency, and you go even further, what can you do and what can you offer
the movement? Can your campaign, and presidency, be a bully pulpit?
Emanuel Pastreich:
Obviously, I support Robert Kennedy’s campaign for President, as I’ve written before. I think there are some issues that he has to address more directly, but I support him. I’m not good at kissing babies and I can see he is a much more professional politician.
However, sadly, he’s taken a path which is very difficult, I would say even impossible. I think it’s an impossible task for him to get the Democratic party nomination.
You mentioned Kennedy’s attack on the CIA. This is a topic we could spend a lot of time on.
I’ll just make a statement which might be controversial enough to wake up the audience.
I’m not a big fan of that old “blame the CIA” analysis. That approach is like blaming butchers or assassins.
Those guys do what they’re told to do by powerful people, by a small group of extremely wealthy families in the United States—those people are the ones making the decisions.
I think that we have to understand correctly that we are talking about class.
I do not want to align myself with the left, or the right, especially since the left in the United States has been possessed by this “gender identity” demon. That identity politics has distorted political discourse and made it almost impossible to talk about class.
Class, by the way, was not a leftist term. The philosopher John Stewart Mills used the term nineteenth century in his analysis without a word about Marx or socialism.
We need to be talking about class, not identity.
I am disappointed in Kennedy’s failure to take on class as an issue, but I am supportive of his campaign.
I’d love to have a debate between myself and Mr. Kennedy, to make truth politics part of the process. But what I really want the American people to understand is that if we follow along with mainstream politics, if we let Biden stay in office, or, God forbid, we have a zombie apocalypse, Biden vs. Trump, if we have these people at consulting firms run the show behind the scenes, then we’re finished.
Those guys are hard at work creating a class society, one in which you, as an ordinary citizen, will not be able to own anything, and will be under surveillance 24 hours a day.
You will be worn down slowly, whether it’s by using the immigration trick, the manipulation of currency, or the outsourcing of manufacturing overseas. They are using any number of tricks to destroy your lives.
We need politics that address real issues:
How is money controlled? Who makes the real decisions in government? Obviously, it’s not Biden, and it wasn’t Trump either.
How can we counter this false politics? We cannot do so just at the top level. Any solution that relies on increased dependence on the Federal Government is not an answer. We need to organize ourselves at the local level.
That means creating our own communities—that has to be at the center of politics.
My position is as follows, and maybe you think it is radical, but I think that in a legal sense it is the only legitimate position a politician can take.
“If you were one of these politicians who sat there twiddling your thumbs while the whole 9/11 comedy show was going on, while the United States was shut down between 2001 and 2004, if you are one of those politicians who spent all his or her time talking about vaccines and lockdowns during operation COVID-19, if you bought into this whole fraud, then how can you possibly be ready to hold office? Basically, you have been collaborating with a corporate fascistic system.”
My job is to take that position, to go one step further than Kennedy can. I am not dismissing him. Maybe he is a far better candidate.
But we are not going to make any progress unless we stake out the front line where we will make our stand.
I believe that our position should be to say that those who have gone along with this massive criminal conspiracy over the last 20 years—and I’d be happy to go into detail about what that conspiracy was—that such people do not have any qualifications to address the American people, to lecture us about anything, really.
And if the media is not reporting on people like you, Chuck, people who are speaking truth, and there’s a whole growing number of people like us, then that media also has no legitimacy.
We don’t need to pay any attention to it, and we have to take it all down it, to take the whole system down.
That doesn’t mean I’m not an anarchist, that I think there should not be a government. The opposite is true.
We have to go back and establish a democracy and a republic that follows the basic principles of the constitution. Being a republic means having an accountable government that is relatively transparent in its processes.
We do not want secret government, a government that is the plaything of private equity, a small handful of multi-billionaire families, and that is for sale to the Saudis and Israelis, to powerful players in Russia, Japan, China, etc.
These guys, at home and abroad, bought stock in the United States and they are essentially trying to sell our country off at fire-sale prices to their private equity friends.
Chuck Fall:
You covered a lot of terrain there!
One thing I have noticed is that you take an acerbic tone, in comparison with other politicians.
You really want to take on the billionaire class
Let me talk another truth candidate, Cynthia McKinney. She recently made a broad appeal at the “Rage against War” rally. We are closely aligned with her at the Green Liberty Caucus in terms of our opposition to war and resisting the military industrial, complex. You take a similar position.
My question for you is, what can we do that is going to rally the masses? What’s it going to take to get people to support a liberty coalition?
You speak frankly about the rot generated by this opaque plutocracy. Some have written about the families behind these developments, and the history of banks and power.
You and I recently spoke with Howard and Rita of the Banking Monitoring Committee at the Green Party on these issues, about how money is created, how the economy can be made democratic, about public ownership of money can be a central part of economic policy.
You touch on these issues in your book “How to take down the Billionaires.”
You are practical in your suggestions, but in terms of contemporary politics, many would say the expressions are incendiary.
You are talking about class, and that we need to face the fact that class is a political issue. There really is a problem with the concentration of wealth in itself. This has gotten much worse under Covid. We witness this huge transfer of wealth.
So please just talk to the American people directly. What do you think we need to do to take down the billionaire class? And why do you think your words are not hyperboles but realistic and practical?
Emanuel Pastreich:
The super-rich have assembled teams of strategy and intelligence advisors who come up with plans for how to control us, ordinary people. This project is not entirely secret, but you need to search around to find out how we are being herded.
Most citizens are unaware of the degree to which wealth has been concentrated over the last 15 years, especially the last 5 years, so much so that a tiny handful of people essentially control more assets than 90% of the entire population, and these super-rich are concerned about protecting their own interests at any cost.
They use state crimes like 9/11 or COVID-19 to consolidate their power.
What is ignored in all the crazy debate about gender, Trump, racism and identity is how the entire military, industrial complex, the police homeland security complex, the financial banking complex, have been taken over by this class and crafted into a super-state, with NATO, World Economic Forum, and private equity firms as its backbone, a super-state that is run to protect their investments and their wealth.
When they went as far as to engage in massive state crimes like 9/11 and COVID19, they were crossing the Rubicon. Obviously, if these crimes are exposed, if a real organized opposition emerges, then all of them can be branded as criminals, taken down, and their assets seized.
For this reason, they do not want these topics to be discussed in politics, but they will allow you to blow off steam in conspiracy website postings.
The strategies they employ together to dumb down the population and to prevent the organization of real opposition has its roots in research conducted at DARPA and RAND back in the 1970s. Research showed how deep trauma could be induced in the entire population through traumatic events, like the Kennedy assassination, 9/11 or COVID-19. That trauma, combined with boredom and low-level stimulation of subconscious desires, creates a psychological state wherein the citizen is not able to conceive of what’s going on, and not capable of organizing resistance.
Operation COVID-19 was above all an effort to traumatize the population so that no one discusses what is going on, no one organizes resistance, and those who are interested in the public good are dismissed, even ostracized.
What should we do?
We have to start to organize a new system of governance, starting with this small group here today. We are small but we are focused. If we reach out to our neighbors, form our own organizations for resistance that stand in opposition to the decadent collection of controlled opposition groups, we will get the ball rolling. We must say that we will not tolerate any of the current fictions, to say we won’t tolerate any of this.
This first step of setting ourselves apart from the compromised crowd requires a sharp cutting edge.
I apologize to those who may be offended by my harsh tone. I personally would prefer to speak in a polite manner.
I try to be as polite as I can towards all of you, the honorable citizens of the United States. But we have no choice, at this point, but to try to awaken the masses.
We have a large part of the population in the United States that is basically asleep. They cannot conceive of the scale the crisis, cannot imagine that a tiny group of the super-rich want to kill them off, destroy their ability to make money, to live independently, to be educated, to take care of their children, etc.
It is an enormous challenge for a politician like me to respond to the current takeover by the rich by organizing resistance to this class war—which many are not even aware of.
That is why, instead of trying to get the nomination of the Democratic Party, I have chosen rather this clarion call, wake up call, approach to politics.
It’s not my preference, but it’s necessary.
This approach has an impact on the larger political discourse. That is to say that if there is one person in the larger political discourse who is willing to start smashing the false idols, or, questioning candidates like Robert Kennedy, asking,
“Why don’t you talk about 9/11?”
“Why don’t you demand that the assets of Pfizer, Moderna, and Black Rock be seized to compensate the people who suffered from the vaccines?”
Those questions will push the envelope for mainstream politics. This is good for the country and is good for Robert Kennedy.
It might even be good for the Democratic party, although I’m not so sure that organization can be saved.
Talking about the Democratic Party, some have praised Robert Kennedy for seeking the Democratic Party nomination and taking on the CIA.
Personally, I had a lot of trouble swallowing this line of argument. If I had to compare the criminality of the CIA and the Democratic Party, I would be late at night. I mean the assumption that you can work with the Democratic Party and take on the CIA is not clear to me.
The Democratic party is one of the best organized criminal syndicates in the world today.
I do not know, but I would guess that if you are looking for someone who is willing to risk his or her life for truth, for good governance, you would be better off looking for that person in the CIA than in the Democratic party today.
So, I am a bit skeptical about any candidate working within the Democratic or Republican parties.
Moreover, let us face facts. We are in the midst of a massive institutional collapse in the United States. We need to go back to the Constitution to get our bearings. And there is not a single word in the Constitution about the Democratic and Republican Parties that govern us.
They have no legitimacy. They are pay-to-play criminal syndicates serving private equity, much of it outside the United States. As far as I am concerned, they belong in the trash.
What if that means that the entire Congress is engaged in criminal activities? Well, I’m really sorry to have to take the harsh position of saying that they’re all criminals. But saying something like that is not factually wrong.
I hope that it doesn’t hurt your feelings to at least get this story out on the table and to declare that if everybody in authority participated in covering up for operation COVID-19, then in a legal sense they’re all collaborators. They’re all co-conspirators. We should just start our political discourse there.
Chuck Fall:
I want to mention that on the Green Liberty Caucus website we have postings written by Sasha Latypova. Ms. Latypova is a retired businesswoman deeply familiar with the FDA approval process. When she looked at the approval process for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccinations, she discovered that this was a national security operation, not a normal public health approval process. It was launched as a national security operation.
I remember back in February, 2020, when I read what was written in the mainstream media, and saw references to a “national security operation” being kicked into gear, I smelled a rat.
In hindsight we can see that this was what happened at the end of January, 2020. Kennedy makes criticisms of the policies, which Sasha articulates more completely.
To put it simply, the Federal Covid response was an attack on the American people. You take a similar position.
This crisis is also linked to a real urgency to return to nature for our health, to restore nature in our nation, and to create supportive communities within our cities, in our neighborhoods, that create mutual aid associations for citizens.
Such mutual aid could be the organic expression of democracy in the community. In that vein, the writings of Murray Bookchin about libertarian municipalism are also featured on the website of the Green Liberty Caucus.
We want to put forth an alternative, but we recognize that one must be educated about what needs to be done.
We need a society that is authentic and human, rooted in the natural.
In your campaign you criticize the plutocracy, and talk about restoring integrity to a republic.
Tell us what that means for we the people in our lives, in our communities?
Emanuel Pastreich:
I speak in detail in my platform about how we can build a green society, a democratic economy, by returning to nature, returning to food, organic food, and by producing our own food after we take back all the land that has been bought up by multinational corporations and the super- rich from around the world.
We should actually own our own country. The best opportunity for creating jobs is a return to family farming. I that’s that should be a top priority for us. But farming is also about security, being food secure, and making sure that we’re healthy.
I would even go as far as to say that family farming is at the roots of the United States.
Let us look at where the United States came from: we signed the Constitution in 1787 that assumed a democratic society wherein the citizen would be engaged in the community that will be run democratically at the local level. The foundations for the democracy were to be agriculture. Citizens would produce their own food, and would not be dependent on corporations or banks.
But the Constitution is not where that vision of a participatory, democratic, agricultural society began.
The Constitution itself was inspired by another Constitution, the “Great Law of the Iroquois Nation” of 1722. That Great Law laid out a vision for a sustainable and democratic society, and a participatory government. It was the Great Law that inspired people like Benjamin Franklin to conceive of a constitution unlike anything in Europe.
The roots of our Constitution are in the sustainable tradition of the native Americans. That is not about the past, but about the future. That native tradition is about how we’re going to survive.
At this moment the Biden administration is working day and night to make bioengineered food a requirement for living. Corporations will be allowed to bioengineer basically everything and to sell it to you without any labels. This dark food revolution is being forced on people by corporations who are buying up farmland and controlling distribution and sales for agricultural products. They will force the American people to eat food which has been bioengineered—we will have no choice.
The latest step is bioengineering food, both plants and animals, to include mRNA proteins that will act as a vaccine.
That will be we will have multinational corporations forcing us to eat things that alter our own genes. I don’t think we have any choice but to go back to family farms.
That will require an enormous shift in our thinking. The commercial media that you’re forced to watch from childhood is telling you that we need the stock market to go up to help the economy.
I say, as candidate for president, America does not need a stock market. The stock market is one of the most parasitic and dangerous parts of the American economy.
I am not against the idea of using stock. Stock can be an effective way to raise money, but the system, as it stands today is essentially fraudulent. The bankers have created a bubble economy, a false economy in which multinational investment, banks and private equity are able to create money out of nothing through the Federal Reserve. They, Goldman Sachs or Vanguard, can use that fake money to buy up real farmland critical to national security, to the security of the American people.
And when they make up that money, that “money” comes out of your pocket because your money in the bank is reduced in value through inflation. Inflation is not like the weather. It is the result of the dilution of your money by printing up money to finance stock buybacks, derivatives and other obscure products of the imagination that serve to enrich the wealthy, the parasitic class.
Tom Rodman:
I hope that we can learn from your knowledge of Asia. Our news sources about China and Korea, or Kazakhstan and central Asia, is quite limited. Perhaps you can provide us some insights.
Mark Goldman:
China is so complicated. What do you think Americans should know about China?
If you are president, how are you going to lead the nation and handle our relationship with China?
Emanuel Pastreich:
Asia is critical to my view of the world. I was a Chinese major at Yale, and I spent time in in Taiwan; I also I speak Japanese and Korean, and I deliver talks in those languages. I think deep knowledge of Asia is an important part of the puzzle.
We want to say that America needs a president who’s fluent in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. Today most people would say that is an impossible demand. But, in fact, it should be obvious.
Asia has become the central part of the world economy. Those countries are making decisions that affect Americans at home. And yet none of our American politicians have that ability in the languages, or even the sense that they need to know Asia that well.
But that sort of ignorance is not the case in China, Japan or Korea. In those countries the major political figures actually speak some English and can certainly read it.
They follow what is going on in the United States.
So, I want to say to the American people that I can read the languages and keep up on China, Japan, and Korea. I understand what is going on there.
I want to state clearly that China is going to be an enormous problem for us, a challenge for us both in terms of who we are and what we want to be.
China is one-sixth of the world population. Any efforts to demonize China using some sort of “yellow peril” ideology are not going to be successful.
China could be a military threat in the future, but the United States itself is the greatest threat to the United States today. We would be much better off focusing on trying to get the Department of Defense, Homeland Security, and the intelligence community to follow the Constitution, to report to Congress, and to respect the rule of law. That task is much more critical issue than fighting with some imagined Chinese threat.
Whether we are talking about trade or the environment, US-China conflicts are ultimately class issues. We have this handful of the super-rich in China and in the United States who put together, for example, operation COVID-19, and they cooperate to push this agenda to destroy the lives of the people in both countries.
The response should not be to demonize China. But rather to say, let’s organize people in the United States and in China to resist this takeover.
If the top-level people of the criminal corporate world in China and the United States are cooperating with each other to destroy us, then we had better cooperate with our peers among working class people of China, or, for that matter, of Europe, or Turkey, or other countries around the world.
I am talking about a return to the politics existed in the 1920s and 1930s, organizing working people around the world.
There are limits to what you can achieve in such internationalist, as opposed to globalist, movements. But the problem is that such efforts are nonexistent today.
The so-called “left” is lost in identity politics. They’re not committed to trying to find some way to take down billionaire parasite class around the world.
I could say a lot about China, but let me stress that the number one priority is to understand China, not to demonize it. Americans need to understand the economy of Sichuan province, to understand how Shanghai is different from Beijing.
We need to understand the Chinese and what they are trying to do.
I was in China last year, and I met a lot of Chinese ordinary workers, as well as intellectuals.
They’re not idiots. They know they’re under attack from this globalist operation COVID-19. They’re suffering from its consequences. They also know how China has been infiltrated by Black Rock, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, the whole nine yards of international investment banks and private equity. They are squeezing the Chinese.
Mark Goldman:
It is wonderful that we have a candidate willing to speak his mind and to speech truth to power in a way that is powerful.
It gives me hope that you understand that what is happening today is no entirely new. You talk about 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination. These state crimes go way back.
What has changed is that the ruling elite have taken off their mask. We now know what their agenda is.
That gives us hope for the future because now we can respond to the threat.
The problem is that we are so divided as a country. Some understand what Emanuel is talking about. But there is an awful lot of people that have never heard these words before. That is the challenge for us is how to we reach out to them so that they can understand what has happened, what the real danger is that we face today.
How do we reach people? How do we break through?
Chuck Fall:
How to overcome this cognitive dissonance?
Emanuel Pastreich:
I appreciate Mark’s question and as I ran for president from 2020 on this truth platform, I have spent a lot of time on the pike, I have a lot experience trying to talk to ordinary people about truth issues and state crimes.
I’ve learned a lot from talking with Mark. Cynthia McKinney’s efforts to take on state crimes from within government have been critical. Her efforts at Rage against War, and Chuck’s efforts, help us move beyond the divisions in the population that have been planned out by the powerful to mislead and divide us.
Divide and conquer is working principle for them.
What we’re doing today, organizing and discussing the facts, is the most important thing that we can do.
Everyone has his or her role. We shouldn’t tell you what your role should be. We should say that you, as citizens who are concerned about your country, your children, your families, and your friends, must be active in your own way to create a political environment wherein we can address real issues and formulate real solutions.
That is what contemporary politics does not offer us now.
The process is not going to be easy. It’s going to require us to essentially take on everybody in the system because everyone is a collaborator.
I think the bottom line for the Green Liberty Caucus is that at the beginning it will seem like we are the oddballs. We are taking on everyone and we are doing what no one else is doing. That can give people the impression that we’re way out there. That is precisely what the billionaires want ordinary people to think.
But I have no doubt that there is an enormous number of people in the United States who are aware that there is something profoundly wrong, an enormous number of people don’t believe the 9/11 and COVID-19 narratives. They’re looking for some alternative.
Our narrative must be repeated enough times to get them to listen. It has to be articulated with enough authority, enough self-confidence, and enough bravery that people start to wake up and get themselves organized.
I’m not a fortune teller, so I can’t tell you exactly how things will unfold. If we look back at history, such political transformations have happened before.
In the 1920s, there were strikes organized against the ruthless automobile manufactures to demand basic rights for workers, and also in steel mills, and elsewhere. The strikes were crushed and most people looked the other way. But the presidential candidate Al Smith was forced to take labor seriously by those events and the foundations for the transformation of the backwards and racist Democratic Party were laid.
Later, in 1932, and especially in 1937, the truth about exploitation of workers, became mainstream politics.
Those years of struggle, when the politicians were out to lunch, was not a waste of time.
The foundations were laid for a massive shift in thinking.
That’s what we’re doing now. We’re laying the foundations for a truly new politics. Whether it will be me at the center, or somebody else, is not important.
Mark ran for president on a truth platform and paid a tremendous price. He passed the torch down to me and I will pass it down to others beyond me. We will reach the promised land. Whether it is in my lifetime is not the critical issue.
I think the vision for the United States should be grounded in the United States Constitution, based on universal principles of human dignity and sustainability, and must avoid those left- right, conservative-liberal rhetorical traps that have been set up for us by the advisors to the super-rich. If we do so, there will be hope for us going forward.
Chuck Fall:
Tell us why you’re running as an independent. Would you consider running navigating into the Green party and competing at their convention?
Where do you see yourself heading? You don’t have to make any hard decisions, now, but I would certainly champion you as a candidate in the Green party. I think you are a green party candidate as you value nature, you address environmental issues and you see technology as a moral issue, not just a scientific issue. I see in you the humanitarian spirit of Martin Luther King when he said,
“Let us realize that the arc of the moral universe is long but that it bends toward justice.”
You could be a solid Green Party candidate because you have established yourself as a leader in the truth movement.
How might you approach the Greens?
Emanuel Pastreich:
So, regarding my decision to run as an independent back in February, 2020, it was clear that if I had tried to jump through the hoops set out by any of the political parties, the Green Party included, that I would not have been able to address the important issues. I would not have been able to come out as the only candidate opposed to operation COVID 19 in February, 2020.
Now things are a little bit different. I feel that it would be meaningful to enter into a discussion with other candidates in the Green Party and even to become an active member of the Green party. I am happy to enter into that process, absolutely.
As I mentioned with regards to Robert Kennedy Jr., however, I think it’s a profound mistake to try to get the nomination from the Democratic party. The Democratic party is just too far gone; it’s beyond redemption.
The Green Party has also been compromised profoundly on multiple critical issues. Maybe they felt they had no choice. Maybe they were issued a series of classified directives limiting what they could talk about. Maybe Homeland Security has assigned them a detail that dictates what topics they can and cannot treat. I do not know.
I am sympathetic to the cause. But we need to create a Green Party that can actually win. We need a candidate who can actually win the Presidency.
There’s only one way to do that, and that is to seize the bulls by the horns, to go full throttle truth politics.
If the Green Party is willing to adopt truth politics, everything will be different. They can turn to the Democrats and Republicans and just say flatly:
“Get the hell off the stage! You guys have no legitimacy. You participated in all these criminal activities over the last twenty years. You took all that money and you worked with private equity and billionaires to secretly push their agenda. You have the blood of 9/11 and COVID 19 all over your dirty hands. You guys have nothing to say. Get out of here!”
If the Green Party can say that, then they are playing from a position of strength and from that moment on the Greens are on track to win the election.
The question will be where the Green Party wants to go.
I am completely open. If the Green Party is willing to include me in future debates, I would be deeply honored.
But I do not think I can tone down, moderate, my positions for a middle-of-the-road, “think left; live right” audience.
Chuck Fall:
I agree with you. We have an essay on our website declaring that the Green Party should lead, should be out in front by denouncing state crimes. I found the language for speaking out about state crimes in the speech that Cynthia McKinney delivered.
It would be wonderful to have a round table discussion with you and Cynthia.
Sasha is also a truth leader, and we had a conversation about truth. I just say frankly that was a state crime; that wasn’t. We’re just frank and honest. That means that we command the space. Sasha refers to it as “the language space.” We are fighting against this “condition of silence,” this taboo realm in the media.
Robert Kennedy is breaking with the taboo by speaking frankly. We can debate whether he is going far enough, or too far. Is he trying in your opinion?
Emanuel Pastreich:
The best analogies for this trauma that leaves behind silence are incest, rape, and child abuse.
The American people or citizens have been so traumatized by what was done to us over the last 50 years, and especially the last 20 years, that we’re incapable of even conceiving of how we’re being abused. Waking ourselves up out of that emotional trauma, being able to address and say this person raped me, that that that’s the first step.
When we get there, when the American people can admit, can recognize, that our government was run by this handful of the rich and that they were using our government to destroy us, demolish our lives, both intellectually and physically, then, and only then, can we move forward.
Chuck Fall:
I hear you. Spider and I have debated the impact of Edward Bernays’s ideas about social control on conditioning of the population via media propaganda.
There is a violence in those big lies. We are told big lies over and over again until we are conditioned.
World Trade Center Building Seven just collapses by itself and we’re told, “The fire did that.” That violence of language and thinking induces in us deep cognitive dissidence. That cognitive dissidence is how people cope. I have an article on our website entitled, “Navigating the Shoals of Cognitive Dissonance in a Sea of Big Lies” which was inspired by Fran Shur’s powerful essay, “Why do good people go silent – or worse – about 9/11?”
Mark, Spider and I are interested in the question of trauma. We are a traumatized nation, and people don’t even think about it. They don’t think they don’t consider that fact in politics. You’re willing to speak to that and acknowledge that. I think your analogy is a fair one.
We must call out state crimes, and other forbidden topics in politics like the fake money supply, and use these topics to galvanize the masses, giving us a rallying point.
Spider:
Let us go back to what you spoke about a few minutes ago, the history of fascist endeavors for mass control. You mentioned Edward Bernays.
I will refresh everyone’s memory. Joseph Goebbels, chief propagandist of the Nazi Party, idolized Bernays. American people were first exposed to his techniques when primed to swallow the United States entry into the First World War. Bernays went on to find ways to get women to start smoking, and so on.
Americans have no idea of the level of psychological manipulation that they are exposed to. Americans live in a fantasy that this is a country that’s beyond reproach, that would never do anything evil. Certainly not to their own people.
In order to hold such an opinion of America, you have to overlook a lot of stuff like the Tuskegee experiments in which African Americans were purposefully allowed to suffer from untreated syphilis, and many other incidents which most Americans probably do not even know about.
If someone brings up these unpleasant facts, many Americans will try to deny them, try to maintain a level of comfort by clinging to an image of America.
So let us dissect fascism. Why does it work? And why do we see it reemerging today? Granted all the warnings we have been given over the last fifty years, why do we see it raising its ugly head again?
Is there something in human nature that allows a person suffering from a certain level of stress accept fascism as a way to feel safe? I think that if we can crack that nut, understand the psychology behind fascistic politics, we can go a long way towards reaching people.
Chuck Fall:
I think that the truth movement speaks to this question, and that’s why there’s a yearning for an answer to the problem of fascism. There is a desire for unity, for building a liberation coalition. We are making efforts, but we do not have a unifying theme.
I think your candidacy for president as a truth leader, provides that theme. And I that’s why I’m on board, and delighted to be advancing this conversation.
Emanuel Pastreich:
So many people involved in the truth movement who come from the conservative side, whether we are talking about the JFK assassination, 9/11, or COVID19. But when they describe this phenomenon, they don’t say “fascism,” they say “communism.”
Yet they are describing the same totalitarian trends, whether they call it communist, or socialist, or leftist.
The super-rich intentionally promote different terms, fascism and communism, with different spins so as to have us fighting each other over ideological perceptions instead of combatting totalitarian rule by the few.
Chuck Fall:
There’s an emerging techno-totalitarianism that’s coming down the pike to get us, and I agree with those on the right that that’s happening. There is a unity that is growing across the board as we recognize global capitalist, totalitarianism.
Emanuel Pastreich:
I want to stress that this campaign is not about me and it’s not about elections. It’s about building substantial movements which are well organized,
I don’t care that much about elections. Elections aren’t all that meaningful these days. But rather I want to change the dialogue on politics and the way in which countries are run.
So, what would be the next step?
The next step is to organize ourselves, so we can make decisions and come to consensus among ourselves about where we stand. Then we can go forward, working with other groups, and put forth proposals for policy.
The failure to articulate concrete policies is one of our greatest weaknesses. There are thoughtful journalists like Whitney Webb, Stephen Corbett, or Caitlin Johnstone who do good work. Their numbers are increasing.
But they are not proposing policy. They are not risking their lives, or careers, standing up to say in person to the government, “you have no legitimacy.”
That is what our role should be. I imagine a future date when the Green Party’s Green Liberty Caucus goes to Homeland Security.
We say to them: “Give us all the information on what happened on 9/11.”
They will just be silent, not sure what to say. Or they will say, “Oh, well, we can’t talk about this. We’ll give you an answer in 5 years.”
Unlike the gutless progressives of the past who are willing to wait forever, until the entire nation is a fascist playground, for things to just get better, unlike them we will respond to Homeland Security thus, “Obviously you’re following classified directives that do not allow you to tell us what the Constitution guarantees us the right to. You have no legitimacy. Resign immediately, all of you!”
That’s when we start to get some action. They will have to decide what they’re going to do.
They can arrest us, or they can try to ignore us.
But if we keep knocking on the door. Keep repeating the same legitimate questions, at a certain point some of the people inside Homeland Security, or Department of Defense, or the White House, are going to start saying to themselves, “Actually, these guys have more legitimacy than Biden, or, Trump, or any of these pay-to-play clowns. Maybe we should start to talk to them.”
At that moment they will open the door a crack and then we will see real change.
It will not be the start of a dialogue, but a shift in the structure of power.
We are talking about how decisions are made, who makes decisions. It is not Biden or McCarthy, or anyone in Congress. All of them, without exception, are being fed material by consulting firms and lobbyists who work for the major financial players. First, we have to tell this truth to the people.
We need to form a very different kind of political party. I don’t like calling it a “party.” It has to be a movement. Large movements like this have been successful before in the United States. We had mass movements in the thirties that actually changed things. It’s totally possible and it’s not about supporting me.
Chuck Fall:
That is what we are doing here. We are having a conversation about how to build a movement and how to find the language that will build a cohesive, coherent program.
There are examples in Uruguay of such programs, and they are linked to the cooperative economies we are building.
So, this must be a multi-layered conversation, and this is our first.
We will meet up again to talk about planning a provisional government, taking down the billionaire class, and building relations across the ideological continuum, so that we can form a caucus that offers a coherent program for the nation.